about advertise contact
Search: Home Vulnerabilities Exploits News Articles RSS Feeds Archive

exploits , vulnerabilities , articles , Coding Around UAC's Logon 'Limitations'




logo
2008-05-01 Coding Around UAC's Logon 'Limitations'

Just about everyone using Windows XP runs the operating system as administrator - or root, if you come from a UNIX background. Such is the case because Microsoft, in its infinite wisdom, figured it somehow made sense to give every user full access to the system, and to more or less completely ignore the intricate and advanced security systems in place in Windows NT and the NTFS file system. This kind of turned out to be a very bad idea, and allowed Microsoft and its 3rd party developers to become hopelessly sloppy; most Windows applications more or less assumed they were run by administrators. It also allowed malware full access to the system when executed. Cue User Account Control.

User Account Control was introduced in Windows Vista as a means to forcefully wake up application developers and users. Even though the first user created on a Windows Vista system is still a member of the Administrators group, this user's privileges are severely limited due to the fact he or she receives not one, but two tokens. They share the first token with a normal, non-admin user: it contains all the basic privileges. The second token contains elevated privileges. This user's applications are started with the first, restricted token, while applications that are granted admin rights (clicking "yes" in the UAC dialog) will be started using the second, unrestricted token. Kenny Kerr explains it better than I do, by the way.


The point is that with UAC, normal users and administrators alike are made aware of any potential security threats; applications that mean harm have to explicitly receive elevated permissions by the user. Therefore, turning UAC off is generally a bad idea (especially since it also disables the sandbox Internet Explorer 7 runs in). I hate to break it to you, but security is annoying. I find it annoying to lock the doors of my house and car every night, and open them again the next morning - however, I still do it, because I don't want to have my gear nicked. Eventually, programmers will get used to UAC, and will cease making applications that assume admin privileges (and therefore, create a lot of UAC dialogs). This may take some time, but they'll get there.


Microsoft also prohibited applications that require elevated permissions from running when the user logs on. The reasons were explained on the UACBlog back in August 2006:


Without blocking applications from prompting for elevation in the user's logon path, both standard users and administrators would have to respond to a User Account Control dialog box on every log on. While this potentially becomes an annoyance for administrators, it is an unusable UI for standard users who cannot drive the UAC elevation prompt without having an administrator around to provide credentials. Furthermore, we advise users to be wary of prompts that appear without them taking an explicit action - and prompts generated at startup go against that advice.


t3xt 1t!

Advertising

Copyright 2007, SecurityDot
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:09:25 +0000

Friends : milw0rm.com , secunia.com , securityfocus.com
GOOGLE
NEWS EXPLOITS VULNS
exploits , 0day exploits , newest exploits , vulnerabilities , newest vulnerabilities , 0day vulnerabilities , newest articles , linux articles , articles
Www.Sexy v ???? ????? www.trisha injector F Ungoye sex Indian nud CMS is Fre www.phonye iranisexga /usr/usrge runcms Sexi karin news for C +localhost Www.fuck.c scar shop.paipa www.169220 Crack+Data sex gils a 200 /compo Ranik Subdreamer phjmsex Sex photo mauricehur news for c maxcpm.inf www.arab_j www.lv87.c &a Fantasi va news for c 200 /compo chinaad8.c Mission im www.23bg.c www.lv87.c www.nuanqi Free . Sax Que precio rwww.ogris n...2F/id. download a DeluxeBB computer a www.ganbei proftpd 1. Que precio www.taodag