about advertise contact
Search: Home Vulnerabilities Exploits News Articles RSS Feeds Archive

exploits , vulnerabilities , articles , Planet GNOME's Lack of Love




logo
2008-05-01 Planet GNOME's Lack of Love

In November 2007, we reported on the GNOME Board Elections of 2007, where Jeff Waugh was getting serious slack from some people in the GNOME community. One of the complaints centred around Waugh's apparent inability to properly take care of requests to be syndicated on Planet GNOME, or other maintenance issues related to PGO. Six months later, this complaint is still valid, according to Rodney Dawes.

On his blog, Dawes states that Planet GNOME is more less "quasi-maintained" and that it is quite difficult to change anything on PGO "due to the lack of responsiveness from Jeff". Dawes goes on to say that PGO is a GNOME site and service, "for the community and by the community", and that as such, it is rather peculiar that it is apparently impossible for GNOME developers to fix the site if the need arises. According to Dawes, Waugh stated six months ago that a solution to the problems was in the works, which would be in place "in a couple of weeks". "Now that it's April, I'm very much wondering where that solution is, as I'm sure plenty of others are as well."


To illustrate the severity of the problem, ITWire dug up several other cases where requests concerning Planet GNOME have been ignored over the past 18 months. The issue seems to stretch beyond the scope of PGO itself, as getting an account on svn seems to be just as troublesome for some people. Many people in the GNOME community seem to take issue with the fact that PGO is maintained by only one person, and that the process of getting added on PGO is not exactly what you'd call transparent. Waugh's defence seems to revolve around him not getting the emails in question or his emails not arriving.


The most sensible evaluation seems to come from Bjorn Lindqvist (thanks to ITWire for pointing this one out):


One could speculate why one doesn't
receive any reply:


1. Jeff gets so many mail each day that he forgot about it.

2. The mail got lost in the spam filter.

3. Jeff doesn't like you.

4. Jeff doesn't like your blog.

5. Jeff doesn't like your politics.

6. Neither you nor your blog is elite enough.

7. planet.gnome.org in an old boys club.


Of those, only 1 and 2 are really plausible. But there is *no way to
know that*. Which is why you people resort to speculations which is
why this whole thread started.


Which is why a transparent process is really really important.


t3xt 1t!

Advertising

Copyright 2007, SecurityDot
Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:01:36 +0000

Friends : milw0rm.com , secunia.com , securityfocus.com
GOOGLE
NEWS EXPLOITS VULNS
exploits , 0day exploits , newest exploits , vulnerabilities , newest vulnerabilities , 0day vulnerabilities , newest articles , linux articles , articles
lo943l 200 /compo Sexgils.co sexlk www.yxwzk. search/exp bx.qmlkj.c Sexy video www.huaxia news for c ftvgrils.c /viewscree bx.qmlkj.c News Searc 834976712. Sexy booty SEXYIMAGES guest book ftvgrils.c apache 1.1 Sextips.co Microsoft www.china- www.tongfu www.chuany sex movie www.kaixin news for c ddox Sexsy girl Www.xxxl.c Hot pictur www.net-ri maquiberry Www.metac 200 /compo www.gucci- Sexse bill gates Command Pr hai www.scl001 www.Pinkwo www.bashan Sexofshrey news for c yellowdog com_user.h news for c www.ccnnzz